bellananax.blogg.se

Onto vs one to one stackexchange
Onto vs one to one stackexchange









  • For decoding- use transpose convolutions, upsampling.
  • onto vs one to one stackexchange

    Encoder goes from a larger image to a smaller image (using max pooling layers etc).Using Tensor Flow to create a simple autoencoder.Also need a corresponding decoder to reconstruct the image back. Just compresses data, for example images from the MNIST database.Pros Dimensionality Reduction and Image denoising.Cons Bad compression and generalizing to datasets.Makes a compressed representation of a data without any human intervention.> $recent_posts = $this->generateRecentPosts($threads) generateRecentPosts uses whatever order it finds in $threads.Lesson 8- Intro to tensorflow Lesson 9- Autoencoders > recent_posts is set by the Catalog class' build method. The catalog puts threads in whatever order it finds them in recent_posts. If there is a format you wish to be supported please say so. What archiving service should we use? archive.is or or something else? Filetypes: I'm not sure if you want support for anything other than books and videos. GET/chan: I'm not sure what's gonna happen to /GET/, but for now what do you want to see comrades? Should we have on the top bar or the sidebar? Should we include it here or should we just link to ? Archiving threads: I don't think this is coming anytime soon, but in the meantime let's see how should this be done. Anything you want to say about it? Themes: I know most of you will use dark, but I like colgate. Flags: Make a thread with the flags we want and name them Inline reply: What is this? I genuinely don't know what is this supposed to mean. Here are some of the issue son github we should be answering. why hand over control to another clique of not even leftist inactives who have control over codebase? even if they fork vichan they site would be down for another couple of days to week while the recreate all the same functionality in vichan that they've enabled hereĪnons let's try to make things clearer for the dev team. the whole point of the split was that space_ was inactive and refusing the mods. Read the readme.md of vichan - it literally says >Vichan has next to no active development.

    onto vs one to one stackexchange

    its more likely vichan will want to merge leftypol changes than the other way around. There is no "developing in parallel", there's 1 team doing active development (leftypol) and another team doing small maintainence patches like once a month MAX (vichan). "Backwater", uh, which one is developing faster, standard vichan or the leftypol version? because the last commit to leftypol-chan was like 2 hours ago and the last commit to vichan was 22 days ago.

    onto vs one to one stackexchange

    ONTO VS ONE TO ONE STACKEXCHANGE CODE

    that would require the tech team to contribute to vichan instead of our fork, so the source code would ultimately be under control of the vichan devs and that would become a bottleneck, because those people would have to approve all changes which would slow down development velocity 2. box-shadow is not gpu-accelerated if you absolutely insist on using a shadow effect, use drop-shadow instead of box-shadow because it supports gpu acceleration >1067 hey plz don't use box-shadow for your "Input fields, focused" section, it is inefficient and runs like shit especially on older laptops, noticeably when you scroll, it's enough to just change the border color.

    onto vs one to one stackexchange

    it's up to the site admin if he wants to comment this out or not, personally i think it's next-to-useless and safe to comment out all in one, and if someone posts in one of those sites through my front-end, i can record what they type in the Name field and steal any tripcodes. so for example i could be a sneaky hacker and make some "webring" front-end site that has a bunch of imageboards sites like, , etc. my guess is it's to prevent the scenario of somebody leaking their tripcode on a fake/spoofed/third-party-front-end of a vichan instance (such as ). however i think on a site like this such a scenario is extremely unlikely. >999 i think it is fixable by commenting out (prepending with //) lines 474-476 i don't really know the reason for why they added referrer header checking for posting replies other than possible cross-site request forgery (CSRF)? i think it is meant more to protect the user rather than anything server-side.









    Onto vs one to one stackexchange